opinion the map alfa GT 1.9

[GPoint]

Hello, I have the same car and I hope I can help, I would imagine that you're self-taught like me. The map of pedal not me ? clear quato I don't understand the you have modified the BP spins fore in this map, you just need to mod, only curves. Maybe to get more? fuel injected you could change the BP of the map QI after the 20kgm. I don't understand why? you have changed the advances that way if you prefissao to inject 80, it was not enough to change only the last BP? Given that I have the same Car I'm very interested in this point to get study material for my own. For over-IQ seem to me to be recopied from some other map, pi? what else I don't understand why? under the 3000 you have them rise up to a maximum of 3 mm3 and after them have also changed in the negative compared to the originals. I would be limited to only increase in the area refers to the value that represents the optimum condition of use.

PS can I ask you what is the change you made to the map refers to the couple in the start-up phase?

[jovandj]

On the map starting you need to improve the cold start my to l'aquila suffered a bit.....the advances are designed to improve the fuel consumption for the map qi you mean quantity? fuel injected? ? I am self-taught on the map the pedal and copied to the ducati corse...the limiter have taken a cue from the ducati corse and juliet 2.0, but interpolated for this map.....the problem, and only a bit of empty from 1400 to 1750 for the rest of the machine consumes little, and walk on the left wing a lot. ..thanks for the first constructive opinion

[jovandj]

Maybe to get more? fuel injected you could change the BP of the map QI after the 20kgm.

I figured out which map you speak perhaps quantity? of fuel injected into the ECM??

[GPoint]

I figured out which map you speak perhaps quantity? of fuel injected into the ECM??

You mean that map, but you hear a p? vacuum compared to the original, or appears to be ir? dead down than when it goes up, rpm now that you have changed? You could simply raise the request to the pedal in the area you like the most? lacking. Also remember that the torque limiter that you set limits the request. Even why? in other maps, such as the lambda and you have been very pi? generous of me and my after in 1500 pushes enough, so it could just be to raise the request to the pedal or the torque limiter.

PS-they Are, however, personal feelings, what for me might seem like a ballistic missile for you might be a horse-drawn carriage

[GPoint]

Ahh I forgot, for the step on mine I just changed the last bp that was originally identical to the second-to-last going to anticipate about 0.5?. On the basis of how they've changed, how can you be sure not to be put in a condition that is risky? I ask you, why? personally, I don't know how to test this change, I don't know how to tell if you are progressing correctly. My question related to the stage he wanted to be this, with a diagnosis in real time you can't understand something? I imagine that if you anticipate too much or too little can ruin the engine, for this I would start from the assumption that the ori up to 60\70mm3 are good to go.

[jovandj]

You say that's not l I tried....the lambda and quite permissive and the problem is that she smokes but does not go as if it was flooded ... and then exceed 1600 and something, and part as a missile

[jovandj]

Ahh I forgot, for the step on mine I just changed the last bp that was originally identical to the second-to-last going to anticipate about 0.5?. On the basis of how they've changed, how can you be sure not to be put in a condition that is risky? I ask you, why? personally, I don't know how to test this change, I don't know how to tell if you are progressing correctly. My question related to the stage he wanted to be this, with a diagnosis in real time you can't understand something? I imagine that if you anticipate too much or too little can ruin the engine, for this I would start from the assumption that the ori up to 60\70mm3 are good to go.

The address phase advances and a little more complicated the ec risk, but it depends on if you pick up the part 60 80 mm3 cmq qi inject for um limited period of time that does not cause any problems also I invite you to compare the advances of the 140cv identical 150, but changes the prail and t inj because the injectors are several well them the advances are different in the first euro 3 regulations vs euro4 second noise etc.....I c I dedicated so much to the study of the advances, and with a great help of jacktheripper2 I figured out how and what to do also for a better understanding of the advances I have to get you a sheet with the durations angle of the injections in order to understand how and ultra-late I'm poor engine fault of the dpf and altrr environmental variables. ...I hope I helped you

[jovandj]

also, you say that I can push over as a torque limiter to 1500??

[GPoint]

I should try to compare your map advances golds with my golds to understand the difference, as I don't have the DPF already? of the series.
For the lim couple have advised me to make it to the pi? linear as possible, maybe even lifting it slightly more? at the bottom, but making the curve more? sweet as possible to avoid rough, however, considers that the clutch and flywheel ? definitely the best on these cars.
Now with the cell and can't review your work, for? I would try to slightly raise the request to the pedal at the bottom, raise the other 3/4mm3 the lim IQ in that range of rpm, even why? in memory it seems to me that the first of the 3500 you have raised very little, only 3 mm3 and after the 3500 15/17 mm3, and try to work on the lim couple as I told you. The lambda in this moment ? limiting according to me, there is a maximum you can work after if you want to try the mod I mentioned above.

[jovandj]

I should try to compare your map advances golds with my golds to understand the difference, as I don't have the DPF already? of the series.
For the lim couple have advised me to make it to the pi? linear as possible, maybe even lifting it slightly more? at the bottom, but making the curve more? sweet as possible to avoid rough, however, considers that the clutch and flywheel ? definitely the best on these cars.
Now with the cell and can't review your work, for? I would try to slightly raise the request to the pedal at the bottom, raise the other 3/4mm3 the lim IQ in that range of rpm, even why? in memory it seems to me that the first of the 3500 you have raised very little, only 3 mm3 and after the 3500 15/17 mm3, and try to work on the lim couple as I told you. The lambda in this moment ? limiting according to me, there is a maximum you can work after if you want to try the mod I mentioned above.

if your and e4 are identical even without dpf, of course, in order to save and only been studied to a map, both with and without dpf, if to compare it with the e3 show significantly differences, I'll try again to raise the torque limiter, and even with the pedal to make it more sensitive, also, I will say that further raise the lim iq is not needed as they are already at about 80, but not enough at the bottom to inject that amount, perhaps on the basis of all the air I can inject 50 55 mm3 of fuel, obviously, 1500 are appropriate about 15 lambda, lambda instead and very limitatante especially at low rpm