Hi to all, the map in question ? my bravo 1.9 mjet 150 hp hw578 sw510, as the title suggests I have physically removed the DPF and I would like an opinion if it can? go.
I have to say that I have already? written and seems to go pretty well, with the smoke, almost nil after the 3500rpm therefore be acceptable, and then I started a little at the top with the increases because if I go down I have vibration problems with the flywheel, even with low rates.
Thank you in advance.
Living without attempting it means to stay with the doubt that you could do it
the two files are not the same machine.
[IMG]http://bannerbreak*****/banners/3/563/135700419269659378.gif[/IMG]
In that sense they are not the same machine?
In the archive c'? the ori and the mod, and I just tried to open them with titanium, and are applied...
What not to v
Living without attempting it means to stay with the doubt that you could do it
I don't find anything strange in the file....
except for some of the maps moddate of which you asked in another thread that the meeting in your mod file....
are you sure that what you have done does not affect anything??do you know what involves a limiter of iq as a function of temp diesel moddato that way??
then I wanted to ask you if those mod to 1cb946,1cbf0c,1cbf72 did you or the time ? however, if you made you to what you refer??
for the rest of the map I do not like it...in the DW starts to moddare at 2500 rpm...the afterlife? of as increase from the maps pedal you can, however, start to moddare from 1500 rpm.. in the lim couple do the same error,if I may call it that,the parties to moddare from 3250 rpm...parts as well..looking for? not to give too much gains in the area of 1750-2500rpm after this area a p? critical to the turbo you can give the increase, that the more you like...the lambda you made them all to 1.1...you made a log to see at least your maf in that area work?
for the turbo of your mod and questionable...by 125 mbar have low and you "satisfied" 100 to high where it should be the opposite...
also do not change the press rail but still raise the pressure limiters....why???
A rider does not create queues even in the car...
a automoblista create queues even on a motorcycle...
That limit iq as a function of temperature diesel I have seen moddare to many here in the forum, but honestly, it's not? if they really can cause damage, in the case, what might happen?
The 3 addresses the fact that he has made the "time".
Regarding the DW are party to 2500 why? if I start from the pi? below also a low percentage (made + tests) I vibrates the flywheel.
The torque limiter are party to 2500, and not from the 3250...
The lambda all to 1 (? the stoichiometric one), since I do not have more? the DPF, I don't think that creates problems.
Still, I have not done a log, the maf see him with air mass, measured and objective? (I use multiecuscan) And it should work in optimal conditions?
For the turbo I have given a little more? to have a better response, and less as the high to not stress it too much.
The limiters rail I increased to give a bit of freedom from the rail itself, and the latter will not have increased, why? however, I think absorb power and then saw a little smoke (almost zero) I haven't felt imporatante it.
The performances are decent but not the greatest, and still repeat the smoke to the high (after 3500rpm) ? almost non-existent.
Living without attempting it means to stay with the doubt that you could do it
sorry actually I was on dekstops a mod file of a bravo with different sw and the consfuso,for the rest of the map I don't like the turbo and the torque limiter and enrichment you could make it a little more prgressivo,maps, lambda, you should check well in diagnosis how to behave for the rest can go.
[IMG]http://bannerbreak*****/banners/3/563/135700419269659378.gif[/IMG]
The rail I would increase a tad, evil does not secure to the performance (without overdoing it of course!)Originally Written by panterargento
In that sense, "it absorbs power" ???
Ok thanks for the advice, but in the specific diagnosis for the lambda how do I adjust using multiecuscan?
For the moment, the torque limiter and enrichment leave them unchanged, while for the turbo is better, as in the screen?
Sincerely with the turbo I have always difficulty? understand how to set it...
Living without attempting it means to stay with the doubt that you could do it
for the turbo and better than before.
[IMG]http://bannerbreak*****/banners/3/563/135700419269659378.gif[/IMG]
msport always very helpful...thanks
Living without attempting it means to stay with the doubt that you could do it
Write permission
Quote