Hi to all
Following various discussions, such as "the map alfa 147 120 hp", " pi? less power consumption" and the other, I wanted to try to make this map based on the logic I had in mind already? by that time, and saw that and was proprosta pi? times here on the forum, I went to work.
what do you think?
Look, I can't see it still, however, wanting to remain in the field of soft I will intervene mainly in the area of the middle/bottom of the rail up to about 70% of the load scaling, an increase from 20 to about 10%. Gi? only cos?, in daily use improves certainly the efficiency and guidabilit? of the medium. For hp of course also touches on touch up injection, and in these cases the laws of physics, unfortunately, we cannot escape..
Originally Written by danny677
Unfortunately, I do not agree, why? otherwise basterebbbe put a beautiful add-on module and the game ? done.
Unfortunately I have not yet had enough time to load the map and see the results. The only doubt I have is maps lambda that I have not touched.
1cb942 ? the work of ecusafe or yours?
1cbcd0 ditto, ? the recovery, it would be better to leave it active...
the turbine 1480 bar at 4750rpm... ? too, it matters that you are already? in chock at 1.4 bar on those rides...
I don't like a lot of the "flatten" to the maps that limit as a function of temperature, and if it happens to break the radiator and you don't realize that the temperature is going up, the engine makes a bang with all that fuel...
The lambda study it carefully, as the advice I can give you of being around the stoichiometric ratio at least in the first column, in order to have the car ready to go when you press the gas, then if you do not want to smoke raise up at about 1130 and if you don't have a problem imposed on the stechio on the whole curve.
Finally, I'll note that the pedal set that way you render? very difficult to maintain a speed? constant...
P.S. the eye what is the turbo pressure in the diagnosis (measured value)
You! Those two addresses I have been mod by time.
With regard to the maps lambda, I can not understand that the logic used to determine the stechio. Just to be sure, the lambda value 1 should be the stoichiometric ratio, while for higher values, we have a rich mixture, to values below 1, we lean mixture.
On edc15 the maps fumes were more simple because indicate directly the value of carburante.arebbe nice to be able to convert the lambda value in mm3 hub.
To map the pedal, this problem I have not thought about. You say you lower the temperature to a low percentage?
for me the maps pedal and also other things are to be reviewed, to map the pedal e.g. parts of 1250 or 1500 not from the beginning of the map, and then a 400% increase over 5000 rpm, it seems to me too much like the ones before
the torque limiter would increase more gradually as at the beginning..
prex turbo 150 points, maybe even something less .
no rail ?
those outside the driver does not know them all , then follow the advice of sandro.
The pedal to 5000rpm ? a test I want to do to see if after 4500 rpm it dies less, but really? I do not care to have those rides.
The pedal is not touched under 1500rpm, and in those revolutions, the percentages are low, you may spierti better.
The rail does not want to touch. I'm making a map, simply by unlocking the various limiters and see what you get. Objective: fairly good performance without smoke
sorry, I wanted to correct my error
The lambda value of 1, when the combustion ? stoichiometric;
< 1, where c'? an excess of fuel;
> 1, where c'? an excess of air.
ok, now ? correct, anyway ? simple, fixed ratio afr that you want the split to 14,7 and multiply it by 1000, what ? the value to use in the map.
But if you want a board maps flaws in the same...
gi? ori are the same, both the top and bottom... I have to do some research to be sure, but the stoichiometric ratio for the diesel if I remember correctly it is around you are 18:1 and 14:1.
Write permission
Quote