Hi guys I would politely an opinion on my current map, Grande Punto 1.3 mjet 75hp scatalizzata, no egr, turbo with intake plus 3mm panel filter and faucet turbo, let me know that I don't know if this map is well made or not, I thank you all in advance
please you should first navigate to the presentation and maybe give a little read of our rules and regulations...in my part it says that you've arrived too allazzato..hello and bun continuation.
[COLOR="#FF0000"]There is a driving force stronger than steam, electricity and atomic energy: the will[/COLOR].
[COLOR="#FF0000"]personal Opinions, for educational purposes only.[/COLOR]
You I was and I apologize, be rude\rude or go for that no ? in my way of being and I'm sorry if the impression I gave, I thought I had taken care of the presentation, but then I remembered that yesterday I couldn't open yet thread, I apologize again and hope that someone can help me =)
Hi,I gave a look at the wing on your map and in my opinion, the ec still working on the maps injection(especially maps air) ,egr excluded correctly ,the map turbo pressure sbagliatissima .This is roughly what I think .
You are right on the turbo, unfortunately the "genius" that made me the map doesn't it ? remembered that my turbine ? controlled mechanically and not electronically, then that map ? totally useless...
the 75 hp should not be electronic management of the turbo? mechanics then you have to act on the wastergate?
75 management maccanica, 90 electronicOriginally Written by luigigtc
exactly, the map ? that but the machine is not walking right, in spite of 1.3 bar peak and 1.2 constants, I could post the chart done in fourth gear with elm for an opinion? the pressure of the rail at 100% throttle in the climb of turns drops and climbs, drops up to 550 bar and ? strange according to me
sorry, but 90 electronic management and for the case of variable geometry?? and instead of the 75 hp mechanical engineering for the fixed geometry??
the fact of the pressure of my 90 hp with elm in 4th gear peak of 1.6 and 1.5, constant ? high pressure, I think your 1,2-1,3 are good, original it seems to me that rpm on 0.9 bar maybe I'm wrong...
yes but I needed the pressure of the rail to tell the truth?, it seems to me too strange, my chart has a trend of disastrous, I'm afraid that the fuel pump has a problem, however, the 90 hp ? the electronically controlled through a valve pierburg with the circuit of the depression, while the 75hp has mechanical handling and wastegate, and then work under pressure =)
Write permission
Quote