Grande Punto mjet 90

[ioni]

Good morning to all !
An acquaintance of mine is ? found the Gp90mjet mapped, in ways that I explained in another discussion.
The car is fine, drives and smokes practically ZERO (the thing has left me amazed in the effects)
It has holes you have as low as 90 of the series), and remembering very well.
It lacks a bit of speed?, according to me in that sense goes a little more? of the original (even why? the car has 6 gears, with the last very long relationship, and rims from 17 that make you sweat a lot in increasing rpm on the left wing!)
Let's say an edit soft but to use already? valid.
With my (poor) knowledge, and based on the map already? this I tried to raise some of the values, with the result "average":
- the car stretches much more? (exceeds 190 shown)
- pushes the pi? to the high, you feel decidedly
- SMOKE a little
What do you think ?
Keep in mind that the guy does NOT WANT to smoke for virtually nothing (I have already? explained that in a diesel without fap ? virtually impossible, to take a gasoline...) and would like the rpestazioni of the second map. I doubt this is a thing possible, he wants the barrel full and the wife drunk...
In the zip there are the original, the modified file found on his car (he had given a workshop to which they had turned to other interventions, a few months ago) and the "my" change of the test.
Thanks !

[SandroMarciano]

if you do not want to smoke, but performance aumentagli the pressure of the turbocharger, the simple...

[ioni]

if you do not want to smoke, but performance aumentagli the pressure of the turbocharger, the simple...

I tried a 5% (that already? I do not think a little on similar turbines) on the map posted, but the result ? pretty much the same.
In general, I hear of GP90 that exceed the 190 without problems : they smoke or not ? To see if c'? some other trick.
According to me smoke (I don't mean black cloud Type style TD 90's) they do it to, but I ask those in the know pi?...

[SandroMarciano]

So I gather that you have increased the pressure to about 0,08 bar... to me doesn't seem so? so...

[ioni]

So I gather that you have increased the pressure to about 0,08 bar... to me doesn't seem so? so...

According to me, the pressure also increases with the diesel, you should see in the diagnosis, the increase in the actual total.
I do not want to shorten the life of the turbine...
Overall, how do you find the map ?

[Ghizmo]

If you don't control diagnosis there? you need to know you will never be able to understand how much you're pushing yourself to the limit and beyond of some of the components.
You don't even know if you're close to the limit.
Series should do between the 1.4 and 1.5 peak....depends on the year of production for what I have been able to note, logging in now so many 90hp that have happened to me.

[ioni]

If you don't control diagnosis there? you need to know you will never be able to understand how much you're pushing yourself to the limit and beyond of some of the components.
You don't even know if you're close to the limit.
Series should do between the 1.4 and 1.5 peak....depends on the year of production for what I have been able to note, logging in now so many 90hp that have happened to me.

To be sure, but to stay anyway, within the limits of safety by avoiding maps "absurd" harmful for the entire machine, I believe that they are always better gains moderate.
I am of the idea that a sports car ? a sports car, a Gp90mjet pu? be funny but not ? for nothing, you can make it the most? performance by ori ma ? absurd to want to push for more? performance. Then mancarebbero, among other things, the brakes and sospensinoi as not (assuming of changing as needed in the engine and transmission to make them hold) to which the expense would be very different, and you always get a GP "changed" and the structural limits of the intrinsic.
Ergo a map that makes 130hp and 200 km/h (assuming this is possible) is not included in my will? for CHOICE.
The final one that I would like to know ? how to have a map soft adequate and appropriate, without conceptual errors.
Everything here !

[carbo92]

To be sure, but to stay anyway, within the limits of safety by avoiding maps "absurd" harmful for the entire machine, I believe that they are always better gains moderate.
I am of the idea that a sports car ? a sports car, a Gp90mjet pu? be funny but not ? for nothing, you can make it the most? performance by ori ma ? absurd to want to push for more? performance. Then mancarebbero, among other things, the brakes and sospensinoi as not (assuming of changing as needed in the engine and transmission to make them hold) to which the expense would be very different, and you always get a GP "changed" and the structural limits of the intrinsic.
Ergo a map that makes 130hp and 200 km/h (assuming this is possible) is not included in my will? for CHOICE.
The final one that I would like to know ? how to have a map soft adequate and appropriate, without conceptual errors.
Everything here !

I would like to help you but the ECM doesn't find me the driver.

[ioni]

I would like to help you but the ECM doesn't find me the driver.

I did (let's say more? or less....) in version 6.2, but I don't know if you can attach these types of files in the forum...

[ioni]

In TITANIUM you can see something with the driver P13_PO95, though ? very limited description of curves, there are several...