check turbo pressure and rail

Hi guys,
I have read all of the discussion of the mjet and I was trying to moddare limiters boost and rail pressure on a 1.3 mjet.
I'm starting with these because the ones the most difficult as far as I know.
We've increased the turbo pressure to 1.5, and of course fails, but I have moved on (I think correctly) limiters: what am I doing wrong according to you?
For the rail I've noticed an increase, but not as much as I wanted to, I expected 1500, but it's not go more than 1420... even here, what the heck am I doing wrong?

Thank you for the help that I can give.

...I confirmed the post before finishing the full title, I apologize to the MOD and, if possible, to amend by inserting that is for the 1.3 Mjet Marelli 6JF

Thanks!

But a limiter you can raise do not move or mistake?

to moved I mean increased...

Hello, for the rail pressure if and a 70HP in addition to that limit, you can't go. however, for the 75 and 90 something you can do, in the turbine, you should raise the values and limiters..

Quote:

---

Originally Written by todos

Hello, for the rail pressure if and a 70HP in addition to that limit, you can't go. however, for the 75 and 90 something you can do, in the turbine, you should raise the values and limiters..

---

Hello, but have you by chance seen the file I attached?
What I know as limiter, turbo the I increased, and the same for the limiter rail pressure that can go and how more than 1420, and in the afternoon, I also solved with that.

I don't understand the recovery pressure turbo which to me seems right.

Hello Zioweb, I too have read that discussion on the marelli mjet and also it seems to me that you have changed the right bits for the l limiter max press turbo, then I do not understand why not go, I wanted to ask you if you want to tell what the bit changed to the address 0660F3, and how you fixed it with the rail pressure

Hello, 0660F3 there is another limiter rail, which is set at 1600 at the moment.
For the rail pressure I solved by changing the map management and increasing it to 100 as I flapped in 1420, and on that map I had the 1520's to the maximum. I deduced that was added to the 100mbar atmospheric pressure, and it worked.

Instead it annoys me the turbo because now we put it to 1.4 and it does not go into recovery, but I wanted to raise the limiter to not get the error and I can not. The turbo is not the do I have to push to 1.5, maybe even just as well, but it was a question of to UNDERSTAND WHY does not work the change.

I can't download the file...but you've moved the 2 limit turbo?

oh yes, both of them I changed by setting them to 1600.

6jf, or 6f3?

I have already written : 6JF

There is a map set at 1.5 bar, a byte at 1.4 and the other 1.8.
These are the limiters turbo on 6jf, and if modified you can climb until the engine and turbo hold without recovery.

I have touched two limiters are identical.
You can not help pointing to the addresses of the bytes in question on this map?
Or if you have another map where you know the byte, could you tell me the code that the sw and maybe have them try?

Thanks!

Hello Uncle web, in the discussion on the marelli, I remembered that fede78 was saying that he had lowered a bit and that he had brought the turbo pressure to 1.5 bar (or 1,55 I don't remember well), (they were the bits that said Backgroup) I tried your file and I found the address 06AF9A, the sequence of the bit is ugualissima to that of fede78, you may want to try that, then I found another bit to set to 1500, which you could also try to address 062F46, (this I do not know, but what of the faith 78 he was working)

hello sisco and thanks for the straight, but how should I set this other bit?

I always think of 1600

sorry, I realize now, I wrote in the previous post "lowered" I meant "modified"

Quote:

---

Originally Written by zioweb

Hello, 0660F3 there is another limiter rail, which is set at 1600 at the moment.
For the rail pressure I solved by changing the map management and increasing it to 100 as I flapped in 1420, and on that map I had the 1520's to the maximum. I deduced that was added to the 100mbar atmospheric pressure, and it worked.

Instead it annoys me the turbo because now we put it to 1.4 and it does not go into recovery, but I wanted to raise the limiter to not get the error and I can not. The turbo is not the do I have to push to 1.5, maybe even just as well, but it was a question of to UNDERSTAND WHY does not work the change.

---

But the atmospheric pressure is not 100mbar but 1000 and it will be taken into account only for the turbo. To the rail or raise the limiters or theoretically does not exceed a threshold of 1450 on the 70 hp

I have just a moment to place a sample..***** s, if memory serves me correctly are at the end of the calibration engine.

Quote:

---

Originally Written by sisco

Hello Uncle web, in the discussion on the marelli, I remembered that fede78 was saying that he had lowered a bit and that he had brought the turbo pressure to 1.5 bar (or 1,55 I don't remember well), (they were the bits that said Backgroup) I tried your file and I found the address 06AF9A, the sequence of the bit is ugualissima to that of fede78, you may want to try that, then I found another bit to set to 1500, which you could also try to address 062F46, (this I do not know, but what of the faith 78 he was working)

---

I try this subitissimo and see what happens!
I have changed these: 0624DC and 062532, but it's still the error.

I add this 06AF9A !

Quote:

---

Originally Written by Errecinque

But the atmospheric pressure is not 100mbar but 1000 and it will be taken into account only for the turbo. To the rail or raise the limiters or theoretically does not exceed a threshold of 1450 on the 70 hp

---

You're right, I wrote a load of crap... I put the +100 because I see that often is added as an offset.

Quote:

---

Originally Written by zioweb

---

unfortunately I do not know otherwise it would be already written here, what I wrote on the limiter, press the turbo I've never tried it (there are those who say that they work, and who says no) if you tried and all you want do know something

but it is certain that you say, on the contrary, with joy I can confirm that the bits for the turbo seems to have been decisive, in that it now no longer comes into failure!

Quote:

---

Originally Written by zioweb

but it is certain that you say, on the contrary, with joy I can confirm that the bits for the turbo seems to have been decisive, in that it now no longer comes into failure!

---

legendary, thank you for responding, now it is also confirmed by you as well as by Fede78 (it was him to find that bit) that works, takes nothing away from that, maybe the other 2 work on other software because it also backgoup said to test them on various vehicles, now you have to do is solve the question of rail, we hope that someone who knows is willing to help you.
best regards Sisco

But with the rail pressure said to have fixed right?

no, I do not salt, as I would like since we have established that the value in the table is not from increase of 100 points... anyway, I have a problem of stability of pressure...

for the turbo, I have to review the diagnosis tomorrow because it is on today's damage, and I have to see if it is the turbo pressure.