processing 1.3 mjet 90hp

hi guys I would have this doubt on the processing of a 1.3 90hp mounted on a astra gtc.
the 90 hp uses a variable geometry turbine, the upgrade then, in theory, would be, or to increase my turbine ori., or adapt to another as, for example, that of the 1.6 mjet 120 hp... right?
the injectors and pump, you can always adopt those of the 120 hp?
I pose these questions to those who may have or have done on this engine to go beyond just the mapping.
surely the original clutch replaced with a reinforced( even why? gi? with a map thrust ? their reliable), and, especially, in maintaining reliability? of the engine without incurring a failure or another.
thanks a lot in advance.

luigi

The turbine of the 1.6 won't be able to fit... all the other system, both of the attacks of implementation, as well as the injectors and pump, these two engines are completely different. Theoretically you could mo0ntare the turbine of the 1.6 PSA and change the injectors and pump with components increased.

Hello louis, this engine supports several upgrades, it depends on the things you look for in the car, that degree of reliability? you want ports, the other important thing is the budget that you have available.......

Quote:

---

Originally Written by blackwolf76

The turbine of the 1.6 won't be able to fit... all the other system, both of the attacks of implementation, as well as the injectors and pump, these two engines are completely different. Theoretically you could mo0ntare the turbine of the 1.6 PSA and change the injectors and pump with components increased.

---

Trusted mounts mounts... there are hundreds of them with the turbine (including me) and you say? pi? c'? who also runs with turbines derived from giulietta 2.0 170cv ;) c'? to work but trust is the management ? pi? simple of what you think ;) wastegate pressure and on.. speech clutch if you have the 6-speed gearbox m20, not c'? the reinforced clutch for your flywheel (bimassa) for? the problem exceeds even in this case, going to fly monomassa and reinforced clutch ;)I would also add a good intercooler and 6 horse... it all depends on what you want from the car and how much you want to spend ;) of course are able to demonstrate to us? I say

kids of that time, the budget I specified because I really don't know what you could do, the car still should as said be reliable, even in the long run, the clutch, I have heard of the edit mono mass of the flywheel and clutch, reinforced my exchange ? a 6-speed.
so ultimately, injectors, pump, could I do to increase my own?

louis if you are looking for a car performance ? one thing, if you are looking for car for 1/4 the Mhp ? another thing, change processes and change costi.................

put already a turbin to the 1.6 120 hp piazzale 1.9 put an intercooler and you have fun without spending a lot

Sure the injectors can increase easily and you also notice a nice difference

If then you have to make the map I recommend not to overdo it.
P.S. also, change the air filter or put a sports

hello luigi,I think that we felt well tefonicamente because you are in our area and you had to come find us to check the mapping, but in the end, you are no longer made alive,we are now in the new shop is much larger with much of the test bench power braked at every way to mount the turbine of the 1.6 according to me, would be the giuto compromise, but go to a turbine of the 2.0 170cv you would definitely end power and you can work at pressures higher with more reliability, but at 100% with a nice turbo lag at the bottom if you look at the icon you tube there are all our video of the car rolled in the workshop including a bravo 1.6 jtdm 120 hp with intercooler, and the turbine of the 2.0 jtdm 170cv, and I have to say that it's strong but still has a little turbo lag, and then evaluates what do you want to get that more power and more turbo lag, or the right power and the right compromise between torque-power,I am on the phone or written on the web I have also heard of 1.3 mjet from 200cv without turbo lag, but trust me, I have to laugh, at least until I go up to try the machines and admitting that I have sbalgiato,if you take a car from 90hp, with some changes and get to 150 hp and the same car with a turbo bigger, that comes to 170cv I guarantee you that on the road the 150 hp and is much more beautiful to drive and with a couple is certainly superior.

but why are all set with these turbines more large taken from other engines??...if you mount the turbine 1'6 maybe, the high will be better but it will have a turbo lag too large and will be a bitch to drive... it's better to other turbines or, at least, it's better to modify the nut of the 1.6 before you try to mount...I fully agree with msport

I, too, think so?, gi? the 1.3 multijet has a very low deficient seen the low capacity; also I wanted to ask you: mounting a turbine is much larger implies to the engine to work with pressures much higher, then you have a loss of bass and mids, but with a higher gain to high? the reliability? at pressures much higher should not be at the expense of reliability

in the 1.3 mjtd believe me you can pull a lot of horses, but the cost ? exaggerated from the pistons... but these are a different type of processing....to move more mass it takes, as you know, a force majeure, the same thing happens with the turbine if the turbine is More big more force it will take? to move it, and then you create in a sort of cap that results in words, words in l turbo....without entering into the speeches of fluid dynamics, and anything else I hope I was clear: I am very good at explaining things xd

great lines I understand... anyway I'll keep active and seguirole the next few answers..

trust me, the crowd of 1.6 makes it better than the original in all conditions... why? also with 0.1 bar of pressure, less than the kp\bv 35 has a flow rate which is almost double... I horsemanship by a month ( around 1.5 bar of pressure, but c'? the people who turn to the 1.9 ... obviously everyone can do as he pleases), and with respect to the turbine golds (girella della motta) pulls better in all conditions... I have 1.1 bar at 2000 rpm and from 2300 up to 4000 1.5 bar after 4000 1.6 (but I never go over 4000 why? I do not like the redline), and trust me, like me there are many, even here on the forum ;)

The Ela.Toretto in respect of the discharge, have mounted a catalyst (200 cells), or you have preserved its original?

I only have the original terminal, skat...;)

ah here it is :D :D; personally in my focus 1.8 tdci, I have removed the silencer and I kept the cat in the original; it has a sound more dark, but has lost a bit of low, earning mid-to-high... I'm going to ask staff to prepare a map appropriate to my focus; what hardware would you recommend for me to buy? I thought of a kessv2... what do you think?