I did not understand what I wanted to say.
Printable View
I did not understand what I wanted to say.
since you feel pulled in, caused you say,
have you read the thread title?
have you read that this is a survey?
DID YOU REALIZE THAT THIS IS NOT A THREAD WHERE YOU WRITE AND POST YOUR CABBAGE?
I.E. DISCUSSIONS THAT STARTED OFF WELL AND THEN THEY ARE ALWAYS DIVERTED IN THE OTHER.
It seems to me that there is a need for ######## in this way. if I posted a thing it was to make an example, and it is an increase of the injection time. Then you say that you have to help, explain, etc..... See if I'm on the nose there? problem , not I get more?, cos? don't dirty the discussions. I am only sorry to have posted the solution to the exclusion egr on the marelli mj8.
look, that's the one solution I know for months if you believe that you have shared your invention show me also the link that I delete your invention and still be in the forum you'll find things that you didn't know then things are to each other,then I invite you to a language more adequate, and also to me is not on the nose no but it doesn't take a genius to understand the title of the discussion and simply respond to this instead of posting the file for opinions etc., with this I close, if you want to connect, or not, to me it is of little import, but when you play you have to follow our rules otherwise intervene as best as I believe it a good day.
in gasoline engines in which the benefits are determined by the quantity? of intake air and the air-gasoline, doesn't it ? always need to change the times of injection.
for at least 2 reasons:
manufacturers are not so? unwary as to give the wrong gasoline for less performance. then the base map usually ? ok
the lambda probes would put in place all in a short time.
in diesel engines, the performance is determined by the quantity? fuel, why? the air ? fixed. therefore, to increase the performance we need to give more? fuel and it takes time injection pi? long. if to do this you use the map injector, or you move the limiters, the end result ? always the same, you want to generate more time? long. always tricks are.....
For the diesel, sometimes not ? need, depends on how far you extend the map time to the original, though ? can unlock the limiters to get to read it all, and especially by which performance you want to achieve. At the end of the performance I think, however, once you have deleted the various limiters, it is necessary to extend the map scaling the axes in order not to fool the ecu about the amount
Fully agree with asdone! Retouch the map injectors ? only necessary if, having increased the limiters of the introduction, the map is not defined in the new area of work. The map should therefore be scaled by extrapolating the values from the earlier trends
I do not edit ever the time of injection.
C'? a lot of inexperience, ? definitely someone not to check with the log.
Time and fuel used for the various tests, is hardly taken into account.
I am in favour of the change of the times.