Printable View
I wanted to make the reading of this ecu daily 16c39 with mpps if you load the protocol daily 35c12 2.3 bosh edc16ck-line as the id read this
Vehicle Type: 270Nm 86kW5 gear m. IVECO DLY
Ecu Type: dc16c39 p315 ids?
Bosch Software Number: 1037378090
System Date: 27-07-07
But when I launch the reading out of the classic written mpps when it does not detect the protocol, I wanted to know if anyone was able to read this ecu with mpps....
Why? do not do it in the Bdm?
I wanted to do a reading to see if I could close the egr I have problems this means every time I turn on engine light and told me the air mass meter I checked all the pipes and I changed the gauge, but he occasionally sends me still anomaly then I read about the protocols of the mpps, and I saw that he was doing it but are in the dark
sorry I have bdm 100, but I see in the list, only this ecu IVECO DAILY 2300 common rail BOSCH EDC 16C8 29BL802CB SSOP now I see otherwise, I mount the egr new
A short time f? with mpps are not able to read the daily 35c9 I don't remember the protocol? I have tried everything...I read only the ID and that's all..
I think that is my same problem makes you id just I have tried everything but nothing I wanted to try with a 16c39 the other half but now I'm delivered....
the cock v2 the law quietly...1250 I don't remember but I can confirm that even to me has worked the mpps v12
well then it will be just a bug of mpps.
Sorry for the intrusion... A friend has a workshop and a daily 35c12 2300 115hp to which they have stolen from the control unit and from the scrap dealer gave him a new edc 16c39 saying that it's okay for that model. The control unit scodificata and mounted, but the means is not a part of. By looking online, and then between the ecm titanium drivers known for that model of Daily the ecu should be a edc16c8. The edc16c39 should only be mounted on the 3000cc. Could you please confirm if mounting a edc16c8 or edc16c39?
Closing the speech, I think that Sno74 not able to read the ecu, why? he tried to read it as edc16c39 and instead ? a edc16c8...but ? just my reasoning...tell me if I'm wrong.Thanks.
sorry, but of what year ? the half that ?3 edc16c8 or MS6.3 then edc16c39, the last 210 hp (I think) mountain edc17