Printable View
Good day friends..
tonight I was struggling with the DPF and EGR to this car, and I have tried to take a step mod
would you give me your opinion and advice?..
Thanks..
The ori can be found here: http://www.professionalchiptuning.ne...4&d=1394620224
and here the step mod with FAP:
The map does not ? bad it is for you can? get pi?, the only thing that I would do are the torque limiters and the rail pressure in order to avoid vibrations of the flywheel at low reggimi with higher gears, the exclusion of the Egr valve ? ok the Dpf with which software have you tried? give it a try and see how it goes
Thanks Backgroop ready for action..Quote:
Originally Written by Backgroop
Mmm? lim,torque and pressure rail?
them rivedr? to better understand..
The FAP of the hand-made with ideas from the various previous files (GS)..
for more tips and riciami on the improvement of your friends are here..
the limiter it would start to change a bit after, and I would give a little more to the pedal, and especially to the turbo.
Or seen the points that I referred to.. so just to be clear?
Out of the driver can you tell me something?
I think you need is the maps of the driver ... or rather, I have not found special maps that had changes out of driver, and it maps an overboost...
If the car has no special modifications such as turbo plus and the other just the maps that suggests the ecm, if you want to do something special and want to lose a bit of time if you follow well the files are there other limiters to change that ecm does not indicate.
type limiters IQ? right?
C'? a discussion of the breakfast where you can? draw http://www.professionalchiptuning.ne...ht=impariamolaQuote:
Originally Written by ducati83
egr was not enough panettone? the luca stanca seems to be made with ecusafe and kmq know ke okay at least on gpunto 120
ok thanks......
guys someone can tell me the address of the luca stanca? I can't figure out where to find it
not ? a single address, we are more? things to touch, and usually with ecusafe or time, you can do
At the end how he was getting on the machine after changing...?
No No the car I covered the end of the month or gi? of them..Quote:
Originally Written by egs
I want to say that he was interested in the d DPF
that is true that I have put in me hand,
"well written, so it looks like something vulgar":o
however, I appogger? always for the safety of the group GS..
discussion moved to section ir? fit, be careful next timeQuote:
Originally Written by cinqueturbo
You believe sq km, I said, ke, in fact, was equal to the one of ecusafe that I know is goodQuote:
Originally Written by cinqueturbo
Guys talking about the part performance you gave a look to the second step?
what do you think and where ec to improve according to you?
your opinions and comments are my testing ;) my friends..
Ok leandro,Quote:
Originally Written by leandro89
sometimes one is confused with the thousands of similar discussions..
mm...Regarding well the rail and the turbo pressure. You could improve it...
But ecusafe is also good l'1.9.1?
no one can help me?
that are limiters of fumosit? that indicates the ecm?
I have done several cars these with Time and has never given me trouble. Of ecusafe I trust a hair less
[QUOTE=cinqueturbo;86212]Or seen the points that I referred to.. so just to be clear?
Out of the driver can you tell me something?
In my opinion the couple ? changed bad I would give more? and, above all, turns ir? high not need starting from 1000 rpm ( and then if a single couple I can I change it always in 2d )...a limiter rail ? wrong value too low if by 322 points to the rail pressure, you can't give 322 points also to the limiter...you are opening times of the injector should be a good percentage!