118 d from 122 hp and 123d 200 hp with a wing nut and titanium

hi guys, I say to you what I've done and give me some advice if you want.

then: a friend of mine has a 118 d-122 hp, I read the fule, I open it with titanium, and start to compare it with the gi file? mapped to a x3 from 150hp to which I do not have the original.

beginning to change: enrichment, acceleration, turbo pressure, rail pressure and all the other various maps working in a percentage, by acting both for presisone rail for pressure turbo a percentage of approximately 10%

in this way I obtained similar values to the map of the x3 already? mapped.

also the pressure limiters torque and change them with the same system.

load the map in the car, and the mechanic tells me that the car seems to never go into the pair.

well, see the file golds to her trainer, the charge on and the car runs better.


known with titanium that this map has rail pressure and turbo increased by only 1 % and the values of enrichment and acceleration are increased by about 300%... no ? increase too overwhelming?

what is this map for titaium? on coswa acts? to give all of this improvement?

as ever with my map with rail and turbo increased by 10% the car was less from the original? went into recovery? I increased too much for a case?

now devonoportarci a 123 d on which we have opi? time to work on it and would like to make the same gains with the titanium of the map on the 118d ? went well without smoking, and various troubles.... do you have any advice on this?

thanks to all as usual for the availability.

ps: but if you are on a map of a 118 d-122 hp I copy the same tables of a 118 new from 143 hp I should not have the same power as the 143cv? why? with the parameters of the x3 was not so good? not have the same engine in the end? strange no?

You can not do copy and paste...
Are 2 motors with different components...
You have to process the file in the correct logic for both engines and the cv out.....

the preparer has increased by 1%, the turbo and the injection. the increases in pi? marked were in the enrichment in acceleration and the car was absolutely fine after the remap...

where I was wrong then I? on the 123 d we should do such a thing?

? wrong to give a 10% of the values in the pi? the turbo and the rail?

why not going with my map made in this manner?

? this there? that I don't understand.

in the map turbo also preparer that was good, I have seen that increases in the values of turbo do 5 points, not percentages across the table...

? proper working as they are?

the turbo increases in points and not in percentage?

bo... this 123d then I read that the edc 17... in the serial is with the cock v50?

the 10% on the rail and' absurd, I usually leave it in gold, the turbo the edit points, the percentage of enrichment and hard to evaluate without seeing the entire map as a whole, of course, these are my ideas and impressions.

Never leave the original Rail? How do you give diesel?
At this point, what would be the map to do more? diesel?
The add-on modules do not work only on the parameters to give hp?
Perhaps it corresponds to something else?

ok then rail 5%... I did a 15 10% for this perhaps was wrong... and turbo... 5 points have to be good?

if you want to hear the turbo from 100 points to begin with.

the turbo should be increased at least as a first step 100 points maximum 200 fixed, not in percentage .
then you can also act on the pedal giving you the most? cos? also l? pi? diesel and pi? sensitivity? having cos? the engine is very ready in acceleration.
then ? better to always start from 0 with the map, or take your cue from a gi? made for the same car .
this is my humble opinion of a beginner. does not the text

in addition to the turbo you will work as a standard pedal 50% and at 1500 rpm, and from there start then it depends on what you want to the owner.

to mail the files , if you want my opinion, if the person who made the map rail has increased the rail of the 10% or 160 bar ... ? definitely a friend of a delphi or pompista
do not last for the seals , then the tuning of the spray made by the engineers at bmw what ? served ?? I recommend to compensate for the loss of pressure due
to a greater extent gambling 1 ,2% max
up to 30 hp is not to increase the prex rail , personally tested at the bench
es bmw 320 d 143 hp , only the map with fap on , rolled 171 hp and 391 lb-ft of max torque and extends up aa 5300 rpm , prex rail 1%+

Ok as soon as I have news? will I update it, ;-)

The turbo in the 118d that was fine was increased by 5 points in the table, however, 5 or 15 now I can't remember,
These 100 points maximum 200 that you advise me to give the turbo I have to give them in the table, right?
I'm not a bit too much?
:-)

in my opinion, you're doing just confused, how do you compare and increment a file mod with another mod file to another machine ? crazy according to me.
attach the file, perhaps with the ecu data we would definitely be able to understand something

Just go in the workshop place the original file and the one made by me

However, I realized that Rail you must incrementar maximum 1x100 in order not to force the pump
? turbo 100 point to? I don't know if is what of the 100 pinti on the turbo is also true for the edc16

Why? edc 16 by valoi edc 17 instead of values with a digit in pi? on the turbo

Limiters torque, it usually 20x100

Just go in the workshop and place the file in which the machine was the same as the original
? a file of how I would do it seguaendo advice

Thanks again for the many responses and advice

the reasoning in points and percentage leave the time they find. It is a misleading reasoning for that ? in the early days. You have to understand first the correlation that c'? between the different maps, on the basis of this lift the various maps. An example can? be that you have a map for fuel and its limiter. In this case, you set a goal on how much you want to inject on the basis of there? adapt the limiter. You realize you cos? by the reasoning in points or percentage that make little sense. Torque limiters are adapting to their time. The rail as others have said, the maps for the cos? say standard, you can leave ori. You edit in the cases in which c'? to inject the right amount? important and you need to change the spray.

Quote:

---

Originally Written by yannsaba

the reasoning in points and percentage leave the time they find. It is a misleading reasoning for that ? in the early days. You have to understand first the correlation that c'? between the different maps, on the basis of this lift the various maps. An example can? be that you have a map for fuel and its limiter. In this case, you set a goal on how much you want to inject on the basis of there? adapt the limiter. You realize you cos? by the reasoning in points or percentage that make little sense. Torque limiters are adapting to their time. The rail as others have said, the maps for the cos? say standard, you can leave ori. You edit in the cases in which c'? to inject the right amount? important and you need to change the spray.

---

sorry, but the spay cos

Quote:

---

Originally Written by giannimini

Ok as soon as I have news? will I update it, ;-)

The turbo in the 118d that was fine was increased by 5 points in the table, however, 5 or 15 now I can't remember,
These 100 points maximum 200 that you advise me to give the turbo I have to give them in the table, right?
I'm not a bit too much?
:-)

---

5 or 15 pts correspond to an increase in the pressure of 0.005 and 0.015 bar. I miss the feel

100-200pti are 0,100-0,200 bar.

Example turbo ori 1,500 bar
Turbo mod with +200pti. 1,700 ar

Turbo mod with 10pti 1,5010

Hello
You can speak nunca changes to the map in porcentuale, nothing in the "points".
All of the maps to one value, mbar, nm, degrees, mm3, etc, etc. and you need to increase in the fair value, but no porcentuale.