mpps v5 and alfa 147 jtdm

Hi

Mpps v5 tested and stratestato on edc16c39 working perfectly.

I have to close an egr on this car (147 1.9 jtdm 120cv 2007) already mapped. I read the file. I close The egr using ecm titanium. Titanium I do not recognize the file, and then does not find the driver, because it was a mod file. I think that mpps automatically corrects the check and go forward. I write and when it gets to 100% instead of giving me the closing of the framework I d? error.

Without closing the framework, rewrite the file that I had read and all v? to a good end.
Ritento for? this time I try file ori and do I fix the check to the program the ecm, but to write the same problem. Ex-mpps and attack the gallov2 I select the driver, and the well-known 2 strange things. By id the ecu told me that the driver was wrong and the number of hw and sw of the id ecu were identical, and obviously you start writing. Rewrite the file read with mpps and all goes well.

I reread the file directly with gallo v2 (id ecu and driver recognizes them perfectly) I prepare it through titanium and I always via gallo v2 and everything works correctly.

Where is the catch?

Strange, I've heard anyone complaining of mpps on edc16c39

Not ? for the case in question of edc16 with size from 1mb not 2mb as usual??

Maybe mpps is confusion between the two types of file...

? happened to me and right on my...

the original file is not found automatically by the titanium, but if I search I exists and is,if I try to put it on my car an original file is not of my own but with the same number of hw and sw of the car is not starting..
? a checksum problem

Quote:

---

Originally Written by blackwolf76

Not ? for the case in question of edc16 with size from 1mb not 2mb as usual??

Maybe mpps is confusion between the two types of file...

---

When you change the file, change the type of the ecu. In the case of a edc16c39 and 2 mb while the c8 and the 1 mb

Also I thought I had a checksum problem. In fact, the error in the d? when it gets to 100% write.

It might not be a file to be hurt by those who had already? mapped?

When ? happened to me the car was completely original

Me other times ? success without the fle, gold, titanium, I recognized the driver automatically. For? always with the maps already? changed.

On the topic of that file that he wrote HAD BOTH THE NUMBER SW HW IDENTICAL THAT you TELL ME?

it is simply a problem of ck.

I had the good fortune to fix with another tool. But in these cases, you might like to proceed?

I think calculating the ck before without any additional it to mpps

As you can see, I tried providing the file ori, by recognizing the driver to the Beck, and, therefore, by opening the file in 2d and then save. Was I wrong?