Printable View
Hello everyone, I was wondering if someone had done experiments with other types of injectors, or replacing the needle and nozzle on the injectors mounted in series on the 1.9 140-150hp.
Starting from the fact that the 140cv mounting 0445 110 111 and the 150hp i 0445 110 243 or 391, what you could do to get a injector very fast?
I had done on the fiesta 1.6 tdci as I said on my post, of course we talk about different courses between a 1.6 and a 1.9 then surely increasing the flow rate of the injectors must have? increase the Rail otherwise I don't know if the spray sara correctly.the same pressure, our ECU can handle without any particular modification, the piezoelectric injectors of the new multijet 2 1.6 and 2.0?
Better explained....what you should improve in this engine??the needle ? an integral part of the pulverizer...
to get a nice p? of power in ir? you need to make a good map without replacing anything
What should I improve? well I should "only" getting to 250cv real, I know the com'? did an injector, I have already? removed someone... are you sure that you just need a map to get 250cv? Have you tried to calculate the time of injection for a deal? of 110mm3 with the injectors original?
hello...so..I believe that both the pump and the injectors of the mjet150hp are capable of doing the 250cv real...the pump as written takes 1,800 bar, and I also think the injectors.Quote:
Originally Written by Blackhawk
You can say that about jtd115, with vnt25 intercooler and exhaust, pump and injectors original, we tested 193cv (egt on 900gradi).
Now, we hybridized the pump ori (post and oversized valves and injectors ori we are like a s3 from 260cv manual transmission.
The last step in the course relates to the mounting of the injectors 120mjet...we are testing;)
For the 150 hp, that you ask, I think they are ir? enough his injectors and pump, maybe holding it up to 1,800 bar, and time to 120mm3.
For the extra, I don't think exist injectors "compatible", but be made a sort of increase in the percentage.
I rolled 234cv on a 147 1.9 mjet 140cv with the exhaust ******,intercoller is increased,the turbine increased and, of course, the mapping,in the following, the owner has also done the pump and injectors, and we have adjusted the map,and we have not rolled, but the car pushed a lot more strong, and I'm sure that it has reached something like 260cv.
Guys, I started this thread but I do not want to translate it in a discussion of who has more? horses, why? if you smontaste your engines and put them on a brake motor, you will see that your horses are much less.
I say this from experience, since I have participated to the test in a testing room.
The 1.9 mjet 16v has well-known problems of the pistons, as they are at the limit with a pressure in the chamber next to the 200 bar related. Depends very much on the map, but the maps made not by ing. bosch motorsport, this results in about 200-210cv. The speech what do I do ? to have a standard? that is closer to the engine series. I guarantee you that an engine with 260cv on the dynamometer, then not real but gi? less, doesn't it ? able to take even 20 minutes to the highway with the gas pedal to the floor. 20 minutes I said think about it to those who are... from this it follows that if the engine in its original configuration ? born to working with injection times of about 700us, and we bring them over 1200us, I can not? to be reliable, we will also need to work with down payments that are too high, raising the CFP in the rooms, past the 200 bar pressure. From this comes the need to have injectors that can inject high quantities? of diesel fuel in the shortest time posiibile..
if it can? serve.. read more here.... http://www.professionalchiptuning.ne...ttori-CR-bosch
hello...
I can not download attachments, can't send me something to ****?
read the rules, because the next time you banno.Quote:
Originally Written by Blackhawk