golf plus 1.9tdi 105hp review, egr

[ago27]

hi all, I closed the egr on my car by following the diagrams on the department, I wanted to know if someone is so kind to give me a look on the file to see if the addresses are correct and if I have closed well. Thanks to those who help me.

[ago27]

how come no one answer me??? thanks

[dvdtuning]

Now I have the chance?, if you have patience by tomorrow I will have you know.

[msport (exil77grande)]

hello definitely had missed the discussion,then the first control is ok but you have to revisit the second control because it's not good.

[rego88]

I am not authorized to download the file.... but the first control you need to bring it to zero, and the second to -1.... not 0

[ago27]

hello msport, could you explain better, I have copied it exactly as it was explained in the suitable section of

[ago27]

I have changed this now, it is good or not tell me more, and also the addresses. thanks

[rego88]

I nn I still have permission to download attachments.... are 2 panettono you see well spungando 32768... hovering it with the mouse you have to see in the decimal over to the first panettone 0.... above the second -1 or better.... where were the panettone....

[cawadany]

There are two cakes to bring to zero. The first ? ok. The second you have not touched, and ? addresses 0D5340 - 0D536A

[msport (exil77grande)]

so guys we do not make confusion,the first example as already said it was fine the first control and the second was almost perfect, but it was not ok,in this last example, however, I saw that the first control is ok, and the second you put gold, but it remained a small mod on then forgive ori the second control then check the box to your right, next to 8bit where it says +/- at this point all of the maps you move to the destination screen, and the control becomes visible as the first, and select from 0D5346 to 0D535E exactly to these addresses at this point, just re-check the box that you previously selected +/- and all the maps you rispostano low as at the beginning,you can now select m tiny and the control is perfectly clear, in fact, if you re-select the check-box +/- see the control perfectly clear as the first,I hope I could explain in case the test and places, or if you have other questions to ask,good job.

[cawadany]

But the second panettone is not to be cleared in this way?

[msport (exil77grande)]

But the second panettone is not to be cleared in this way?

in what way sorry haven't posted anything,however, I have learn step by step how to do it.

[cawadany]

In the way indicated by the guide present in the diesel. I have attached the screen in my previous post.
According to your instructions, the mod would be different, or am I wrong?

[magi1984]

But the second panettone is not to be cleared in this way?

you ? correct

[msport (exil77grande)]

In the way indicated by the guide present in the diesel. I have attached the screen in my previous post.
According to your instructions, the mod would be different, or am I wrong?

then if you look at the second control as your attachment it is one thing if you look at it by selecting the box with +/- and another if you do as I told you, there is nothing different about the test and mail.

[admin]

There are two cakes to bring to zero. The first ? ok. The second you have not touched, and ? addresses 0D5340 - 0D536A

guys please let's not talk about panettone christmas is approaching and I are making me want a nice panettone :D

[cawadany]

I tried to do it with your instructions and I understand cos?. Maybe something wrong I....

[msport (exil77grande)]

I tried to do it with your instructions and I understand cos?. Maybe something wrong I....

now select the box with +/- and see that it is identical to the previous control, even if it is actually, according to the screen posted in the guide, not by me, it's a snap different and it would be like you said you initially, but I use this system I can't remember if I've always done so, or initially, I did as the guide there will be a reason that now I can not remember so if you can do a test well may do as I say and you look at the diagnosis, then do as the guide and redo the diagnosis would you do me a courtesy that I refresh your memory too.

[magi1984]

cos? ? wrong according to me, ? right as you posted in the previous post.
among other things, yesterday I run the same mod to close the egr on a golf 6 140cv with edc17

[admin]

http://img846.imageshack.us/img846/1521/immaginetitanium.png (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/846/immaginetitanium.png/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us http://imageshack.us)


Here is the check that says msport

[msport (exil77grande)]

cos? ? wrong according to me, ? right as you posted in the previous post.
among other things, yesterday I run the same mod to close the egr on a golf 6 140cv with edc17

you for that ok pero I don't remember if I have done so on a particular machine, or if you like the guide and I'm making confusion.

[msport (exil77grande)]

but guys if you do as in the screen of the guide, and then select the check box, + / - do you see a difference of 100 points in almost all of the map because if the control should be set at 0?
I did as the guide or to a particular machine or to this observation I made as explained just above, but at this point, the beginning for a moment at bosco I don't know if there is a difference you should try in the diagnosis of both methods.

[cawadany]

Then, I've tested it as a guide on a Leon 2.0 TDI 140 EDC16, and diagnosis of the EGR remained fixed at 96.4%. I remember that you Msport said to me that you had just had the opportunity to do the work on a Golf V 2.0 TDI and diagnosis of the EGR you remained fixed at 97%. Then I don't know if you had used your method, or that of the guide.

[msport (exil77grande)]

Then, I've tested it as a guide on a Leon 2.0 TDI 140 EDC16, and diagnosis of the EGR remained fixed at 96.4%. I remember that you Msport said to me that you had just had the opportunity to do the work on a Golf V 2.0 TDI and diagnosis of the EGR you remained fixed at 97%. Then I don't know if you had used your method, or that of the guide.

perfect not even remember me which method I used, but if you try for a moment with the system that I mentioned, what difference do you find in the diagnosis?
you can check?

[cawadany]

perfect not even remember me which method I used, but if you try for a moment with the system that I mentioned, what difference do you find in the diagnosis?
you can check?

Unfortunately I have no way to verify....

[ago27]

hi guys, I appreciate all your interest, I have followed the specifications explained by our common friend msport and I hope I have done the work in the mado right, I am attaching the file (hopefully good)

[cawadany]

We are not there. You have to select the range of addresses that you said msport and bring the value to the minimum, press m (lowercase). Maybe I'm wrong, but you hold the M (upper case).

[ago27]

now, I made it exactly as described by our friend msport, let's see how and gone

[ago27]

guys what about the last post. and the choir so tomorrow the load

[cawadany]

so guys we do not make confusion,the first example as already said it was fine the first control and the second was almost perfect, but it was not ok,in this last example, however, I saw that the first control is ok, and the second you put gold, but it remained a small mod on then forgive ori the second control then check the box to your right, next to 8bit where it says +/- at this point all of the maps you move to the destination screen, and the control becomes visible as the first, and select from 0D5346 to 0D535E exactly to these addresses at this point, just re-check the box that you previously selected +/- and all the maps you rispostano low as at the beginning,you can now select m tiny and the control is perfectly clear, in fact, if you re-select the check-box +/- see the control perfectly clear as the first,I hope I could explain in case the test and places, or if you have other questions to ask,good job.

However, I think you were wrong to indicate the addresses. By selecting the +/- the maps are brought to the centre, and if we want to reset the second one as the first one I need to bring to zero by 0D5344 to 0D5360. Or am I wrong?

1482

[msport (exil77grande)]

guys what about the last post. and the choir so tomorrow the load

for me, so okay,in the case as a matter of fairness if you have to do to diagnose and test the egr control ori then do mod it so, and, finally, if you like you can do a third test to see if there is a difference.

[ago27]

no you do not have to start from 0D5344 to 0D5360, but you have to select exactly the two addresses indicated by msport, it is clear, then when you go to make sure you'll see it from 0D5344 but it is not from them that you need to change, absolutely no......

[msport (exil77grande)]

However, I think you were wrong to indicate the addresses. By selecting the +/- the maps are brought to the centre, and if we want to reset the second one as the first one I need to bring to zero by 0D5344 to 0D5360. Or am I wrong?

1482


I confirm what was previously written, for me the addresses you want to select are from 0D5346 to 0D535E because as you have selected you there are some maps where the controls are slightly different and would be unpacked,you will always select from the top never from the bottom point,guys without presumption I these controls do them with your eyes closed and think so if anyone has different ways and is right on the cg?he will do as he sees fit.

[ago27]

thanks msport, finally I managed to do that then was not very difficult, I feel I have a cable vcds 10.6 and that you know the steps to see if the EGR and closed. Thanks

[msport (exil77grande)]

thanks msport, finally I managed to do that then was not very difficult, I feel I have a cable vcds 10.6 and that you know the steps to see if the EGR and closed. Thanks

we are here for,no I'm sorry for this I can not help you open a post in the suitable section of surely someone unfamiliar with this cable you can find it.

[ago27]

but just to know the first control as you adjust it ????? No because I have modified by hand, the cio? I selected the two addresses, and then less, until and down to -100,0, or there is a method more simple to do it as the second control, i.e. by pressing m.....thanks

[msport (exil77grande)]

but just to know the first control as you adjust it ????? No because I have modified by hand, the cio? I selected the two addresses, and then less, until and down to -100,0, or there is a method more simple to do it as the second control, i.e. by pressing m.....thanks

certain you need to do exactly the same thing i.e. to select the beginning and the end of the 2 top corners, and then select m lowercase of course, the map must be in the bass if you have +/- selected or not, and it's done.

[cawadany]

I confirm what was previously written, for me the addresses you want to select are from 0D5346 to 0D535E because as you have selected you there are some maps where the controls are slightly different and would be unpacked,you will always select from the top never from the bottom point,guys without presumption I these controls do them with your eyes closed and think so if anyone has different ways and is right on the cg?he will do as he sees fit.

You are right, I am confused.....

[cawadany]

but just to know the first control as you adjust it ????? No because I have modified by hand, the cio? I selected the two addresses, and then less, until and down to -100,0, or there is a method more simple to do it as the second control, i.e. by pressing m.....thanks

Am I wrong or the first control does not ? perfectly to zero?

[ago27]

sorry but I can not find on our forum section dedicated to the cable vcds, someone can help me????

[cawadany]

Take a look in the section on diagnosis.
However, as I said I check the first control egr.

[msport (exil77grande)]

for me it's ok, the first control.

[cawadany]

A zero cos?????

1498

[msport (exil77grande)]

A zero cos?????

1498

certainly, because according to you, no?

[cawadany]

certainly, because according to you, no?

In the box dec should not be zero?

[msport (exil77grande)]

In the box dec should not be zero?

exact should be 0 but I don't understand how did he give -100% increase and stay at 1 dec that then it would be a 1 point decrease and made perhaps because he has done manually, and as I explained in the second point in time by selecting from x to y and click on the m lower-case,however, I think that even so, it was closed but it's just correct it.

[ago27]

I'm back here guys, because I'm a little more seasoned of you, but I have always been attracted to the phobia of the tuning. I wanted to ask do you think with the EGR closed, the temperature of the radiator water ragiunge the regime of 90 degrees more or less at the time???? According to me there put? pi? since the exhaust gases are already? warm if not pass into the intake manifold and in the combustion chamber where, in this way, arriver? only the cold air of the interculer, or mistake, thanks to those who interverr

[msport (exil77grande)]

it is, in fact, should impigare something more to reach the temperature,however, if you read just above the user cawadany noted that the first control that will surely modificavi in a different manner than my explanation has a slight error that you should fix.

[ago27]

You msport, I saw that little bit of difference on the first control, and I've already changed

[Mr.Flash]

Then, I've tested it as a guide on a Leon 2.0 TDI 140 EDC16, and diagnosis of the EGR remained fixed at 96.4%. I remember that you Msport said to me that you had just had the opportunity to do the work on a Golf V 2.0 TDI and diagnosis of the EGR you remained fixed at 97%. Then I don't know if you had used your method, or that of the guide.


hello, if it can be of a contribution, I have verified that myself. I don't see the attachments above. The system that I attach leads to a diagnostic on the EGR to a value of 97% fixed. I have always wondered why it's not 100% as in other cases.

[msport (exil77grande)]

in practice, it would be 4% of the edc16c39.