mpps and edc16c39?

[macinische90]

Hello all anyone ? managed to read this ECU with mpps? Thanks guys

[alex68]

what ecu are you talking about? why? you are not clear to specify the model of car etc etc etc
anyway mpps these are the reads and writes.

[macinische90]

edc16c39 lancia delta 2.o mtj 165 hp, but mpps nn the reads and writes ... I'm sorry

[alex68]

if you talk about the delta 165 hp, then let's change the topic.
you can go trank with bdm cock kess.

[macinische90]

in fact, nn the law already tried it and resold it... now I'm trying the kess of a friend is great.. thanks alex68.

[davpet92]

hello, I have a mpps clone, tried it on a bravo 1.9 mjet 120 hp with edc16c39, there took half an hour (or more?)but the bed quietly.,.. I have the version 12, so that the wired black....(non-transparent)

[rodcraft86]

the edc16c39 fiat alfa lancia are read in the k-line, and then we want more? time ? normal

[davpet92]

sisi in fact, now I don't know whether to buy adapter for bmw, and more) or buy another diagnostic (type wing nut) included already? of adapters (in the case that the mpps or galletto do misfiring, I have already? the other ready-to-use) xD

[huntersub84]

I was considering a mpps v12.nonsoch? for edc16c39 of the 1.9 jtdm 150cv of my 159, I read it in half an hour and more? with the cock in the first model, but I was definitely afraid to write with that interface (that then maybe it's all smooth, but I don't trust)
I was considering then the mpps for the cost and possibility? of recovery, in italy with 28€ if they are of the transparent ones where they offer a warranty if they don't work (which we hope will be tested before sale)
the doubt arises? my brother-in-law would like to put his hand to his 2.0 jtdm from 170cv always alfa 159 and as I understand not decide to take the smooth with this interface.
Maybe ? better give it up and point to a BMD100 cos? to live a tranquil life by first doing a full backup and then mapping and rewriting always in the bdm?
should be the solution pi? reliable in the absolute, you agree with me?

[ake85]

[huntersub84]

but the dear old BDM100 is not good? I have a clone with dima and scedini spring I found it for 120€, if added 28€ mpps..let's say that with 150€ I can do a total backup with the original mapping, and then write for convenience? in the serial

a galletto 2, kess v2, etc, etc. I see that they are all about 200€, which then end? to do just my car or at max I repeat that my brother-in-law, turns and turns I do first to pay someone in the area to me, I give him the file that I have prepared and I get put in
bo, I am really confused about what to do, even why? I do not want to go back in the lap of the maps, I want to make a personal use only

[ema74]

handicap of the ktag and that you have to do the tour, but go safe

[huntersub84]

update

I have purchased from baya, a template for BDM with a schedule of the spring, between one thing and another it will take 10giorni for it.
I was evaluating the situation better
With 50-55€ can I have the bdm100 new and tested, but then I'd be forced to write always with that, having sold my cock first series (awaiting payment)
or..or
for 80-85€ approximately, what? 30€ in pi? I get the galletto 2 V52 unless I misread, with this I can read and write in pi? mode?

The idea ? to open up my ecu, do a total backup BDM, then throw in the map serial for practicality?.
Practically you want a crash, you want a block, or that which is, in any case, I have my beautiful original backup that I can always throw in bdm, and I would have the comfort? to read and write quickly via serial
all this with only one tool, the cock 2...do you agree with my analysis?
the drive to do will be mainly
alfa romeo 159 1.9 16v
alfa romeo 159 2.0 16v
maybe a BMW E90 320D

but mainly the alpha are the priority?

what do you think? my idea ? be good or I'm taking a blunder why? really? there are bugs of the reliability? with the galletto BDM or some echo not the law of your own?

Thanks again
Mauro

[jovandj]

Mah I 1.9 I have made several in serial with mpps read in 43 min file 2 mega and written in 50 seconds, never had any problems edc16c39 idem edc16c8 read in 30 minutes written in 3 4

[huntersub84]

of course, I have no doubt on the effectiveness of mpps, I know people who has done dozens of scriptures without problems.
And' just my fisima for peaceful sleeping, I want a backup in BDM to avoid any risk, and then a programmer in the serial..that's why? I thought of the new cock. Among other things, the mpps do not think that read and write to the 2.0 jtdm alfa romeo..

You specifically which version are you using?

[jovandj]

of course, I have no doubt on the effectiveness of mpps, I know people who has done dozens of scriptures without problems.
And' just my fisima for peaceful sleeping, I want a backup in BDM to avoid any risk, and then a programmer in the serial..that's why? I thought of the new cock. Among other things, the mpps do not think that read and write to the 2.0 jtdm alfa romeo..
You specifically which version are you using?

13.02 transparent gray box made of 70 scriptures on my gt made a number of 147 and 156 is 140 150 hp then edc16c39 and c8 read, but not written punto 1.2 8v marelli iaw without problems...mpps and quite reliable also has the function of recovery

[huntersub84]

yes, I saw it on youtube a type that has detached for error on the USB during the writing and in the recovery recovered.
For? edc16c39 I can do as well with the old rooster who I am, but I think for the mpps do not I have the chance? on the 2.0 jtdm in spite of the ECU is always edc16c39 if I'm not mistaken

[jovandj]

yes, I saw it on youtube a type that has detached for error on the USB during the writing and in the recovery recovered.
For? edc16c39 I can do as well with the old rooster who I am, but I think for the mpps do not I have the chance? on the 2.0 jtdm in spite of the ECU is always edc16c39 if I'm not mistaken

Oh god, I don't know if the 2.0 170 does it or no I do not and happened

[huntersub84]

time lost if we take a look on compatible cars I remove a doubt..even if I think I have read that someone forces with other protocols?...

[jovandj]

The giulietta 2.0 not me the door, but not even the 159 1.9 pero I made if I remember smale...I saw that mpps 16 is both safe I have the old version is a short step to kess v2 or cock 2

[maurof650]

hello, I have a mpps clone, tried it on a bravo 1.9 mjet 120 hp with edc16c39, there took half an hour (or more?)but the bed quietly.,.. I have the version 12, so that the wired black....(non-transparent)

I have read a Good 1900 cc, 120 hp year 2007.........I wanted to know if that file reads (size)

[thekid]

Should read it without any problem with a reading time of 40 min about the file ? 2mb

[jovandj]

Mpps should be read in about 45 minutes the file and 2mb and when the laws probably will give you a failure vdc abs, asr, normal

[maurof650]

What do you mean? I don't understand.

[jovandj]

Exactly what I said, read the obd in 45 minutes the file and 2mb during the reading can give you faulty abs asr vdc on the framework