Deleting the EGR VW Polo 1.9 TDI EDC15P [Archive]

cawadany

13-09-2012, 09:25

Should I disable the EGR on a VW Polo 1.9 TDI 101cv, ECU EDC15P.
I pulled a straight line on the "serration" on the map phase, place 1/2 and 2/2 (related, I think).
Can someone tell me the pu? say if ? ok the mod? Then before writing I need to calculate the checksum given that the MPPS does not automatically on this ECU.

magi1984

13-09-2012, 11:35

try this file, I closed the egr in a different way from your...the checksum I did with ecm

cawadany

13-09-2012, 12:01

In fact, you have done more? correct I know, what? going to disable the management EGR, as you do with the EDC16 always VAG. In the way done by me c'? pi? risk to turn on the light engine maybe....

dvdtuning

13-09-2012, 14:20

Then both methods on the edc15 are valid, one alternative to another, right? Maybe if you zeroing in hex should be fine even with the egr route...has anyone ever tried it?

cawadany

13-09-2012, 17:40

Then both methods on the edc15 are valid, one alternative to another, right? Maybe if you zeroing in hex should be fine even with the egr route...has anyone ever tried it?

Probably the EDC15 are not so? "demanding" compared to a EDC16, and do not create problems even with the first method, even why? I know that they are only Euro3.
For? as I have already? that said, I think that the second method is the best.
One thing: before writing on this ecu goes correct the checksum. From what I understand the Ecm Titanium corrects it automatically when you go to edit and save the file, provided that you load the driver. Then after you have saved the modified file, you have to do is write it? The checksum ? gi? corrected automatically by the Ecm?

blitz3r

13-09-2012, 18:03

cawadany

13-09-2012, 18:11

See if this is for you:

1116

The ECM calculates the checksum only if you have the driver loaded, or select the family checksum suitable to the ecu (if enabled) when you save the file.

Greetings!!! :cool:

Thanks a lot, this ? the first method that I have used practically, that which excludes the operation of the EGR, but leaves the active controls.
For the checksum, then having the driver loaded me it is calculated automatically when I save the mod file. I understood well?

magi1984

13-09-2012, 18:19

exact.
in the file that I did the checksum ? gi? calculated

blitz3r

13-09-2012, 18:30

Thanks a lot, this ? the first method that I have used practically, that which excludes the operation of the EGR, but leaves the active controls.
For the checksum, then having the driver loaded me it is calculated automatically when I save the mod file. I understood well?

Yes, but don't trust it, it depends if the person who completed the driver has not entered the family of the checksum, you calculate, and anyway, ECM titanium, it should tell you at the time of saving that the checksum is not ? been corrected, and we will guide you to correct it.

Then, ill go, various serial interfaces, correct the checksum before writing (on most cars), then you have a security in ir?.

you have to be careful in any case, do not rely blindly on to the software ;D

cawadany

13-09-2012, 18:34

Yes, but don't trust it, it depends if the person who completed the driver has not entered the family of the checksum, you calculate, and anyway, ECM titanium, it should tell you at the time of saving that the checksum is not ? been corrected, and we will guide you to correct it.

Then, ill go, various serial interfaces, correct the checksum before writing (on most cars), then you have a security in ir?.

you have to be careful in any case, do not rely blindly on to the software ;D

To write to use MPPS, and on this ecu are 100% sure that the checksum is not calculated.

cicciogsr

13-09-2012, 19:04

mpps does not compute...you need to adjust for strength before you write it

msport (exil77grande)

13-09-2012, 19:32

guys it was clearly written that the ck was calculated and then I don't see the problem where it's at.

cawadany

13-09-2012, 19:33

Ok. Among other things, the ECM is giving me 2 driver with the file gold medals: one for golf 1.9 TDI 130, and the other a polo 1.9 TDI 90. The car ? a polo 1.9 TDI 101. Which driver should I use? Or ? indifferent, especially for the purposes of calculating the checksum?

msport (exil77grande)

13-09-2012, 19:34

if the titanium gives you two drivers you can use both definitely in the family, and is the same also for the calculation of the ck.

cawadany

13-09-2012, 19:34

guys it was clearly written that the ck was calculated and then I don't see the problem where it's at.

Still wanted to understand, and not to limit myself to upload a file already? ready...

magi1984

13-09-2012, 20:06

I have made the file only as an example. Then you're ****** upload what you want or try them both

cawadany

13-09-2012, 20:20

I have made the file only as an example. Then you're ****** upload what you want or try them both

And, in fact, thank you! Not ? to not trust nor anything else ? only a desire to learn.

cawadany

14-09-2012, 11:44

But ? normal that there are these differences in the data between the two drivers? Selecting the file ori in question to me by two drivers available, and even the data controller and the data cks are different.....

http://imageshack.us/a/img214/2381/screenshotdriver.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/214/screenshotdriver.jpg/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us http://imageshack.us)

cicciogsr

14-09-2012, 11:46

in order not to have problems with foul calculate winols and then write quietly

cawadany

14-09-2012, 11:51

in order not to have problems with foul calculate winols and then write quietly

Sincerely Winols do not know to use. I am a beginner and it seems to me the most? simple and intuitive to use Ecm. For a beginner like me, I see him more? suitable here...

cicciogsr

14-09-2012, 11:52

email the file that you want to upload that I calculation I

cawadany

14-09-2012 12:00 pm

And here it is. Made in the ECM without selecting the driver, so it should not have calculated the checksum.

cicciogsr

14-09-2012, 12:09

here he is chk calculated... for the sake I would have cleared as well, the first control..

cawadany

14-09-2012, 12:20

here he is chk calculated... for the sake I would have cleared as well, the first control..

Can you tell me what address do I find it?

cicciogsr

14-09-2012, 12:30

do you want the closes in the classic way ... or you azzerro all the controls?... the first way ? ultra tested for the second time I have used it a couple of times.. you tell me

cawadany

14-09-2012, 12:52

Pi? what else we are sure that with the way classic will not turn on the light engine?

cicciogsr

14-09-2012, 12:54

no ..now you place the do all and two with chk correct.. wait a few minutes

cicciogsr

14-09-2012, 13:06

here they are from an eye chk correct

mavaila1972

14-09-2012, 13:15

try this file, I closed the egr in a different way from your...the checksum I did with ecm

great job so it is completely disabled

cawadany

14-09-2012, 13:51

here they are from an eye chk correct

The one with the method of the controls ? similar to that made by me and by the Magi, but I noticed that you have not lowered to zero, the second control, and you touched a control that is located before.

cicciogsr

14-09-2012, 14:34

ok I had not seen the file at the beginning you're right, the controls are all back to zero ? was an oversight you place the file cleared..

cawadany

14-09-2012, 14:40

ok I had not seen the file at the beginning you're right, the controls are all back to zero ? was an oversight you place the file cleared..

Perfect thanks. A strange curiosity?: but as ever touches that control in the pi? compared to what I touched I?

cawadany

15-09-2012, 09:31

Guys but in the end what method would you recommend for me to use? Lower the panettone, or pull in a straight line on the popular serration? ;) Is that with the second method to store the error in the engine control unit?