Problem indicator fap after luca stanca opel corsa 1.3 90 bhp

[infinityecu]

Hi all, after having defappato a opel corsa 1.3 90 cv after a few days ? pop-up, the light on the fap and virtually diagnosis the sensor differential pressure varies as the value resets the fap, the light disappears, but after a few more days, along a bit of miles reappears, but errors in diagnosis really does not appear as a.....*****and the software I used when the loader but, surely, the swicth off did not complete the software so I don't know which precise point change for this ecu some good soul kind could give me an indication of the point you want to edit, and which values give, or I don't know postarmi the file correct??? I am attaching the file ori and mod infinite thanks to all those who will help me...

[ugoboss]

I can't do it, and then I can't help you and I'm sorry, I know from experience of friends that the time is wrong, and it doesn't do it carsoft-dpf-fap-off.

[Backgroop]

I can't do it, and then I can't help you and I'm sorry, I know from experience of friends that the time is wrong, and it doesn't do it carsoft-dpf-fap-off.

Hello The time has not done well this ecu, it is necessary to intervene manually to reset the dtc's and other controls in the file, not ? an easy thing you need to do some tests with the diagnosis, etc. in the care of someone who knows how to do well, the Online service of the forum for example, where there are people prepared..

[pabloescobar]

But this car ? a 75hp no 90

6472
Test so

Hello

[infinityecu]

But this car ? a 75hp no 90

Thank you all for the responses and, in particular, to pabloescobar to which I respond by saying that the machine in question ? a 90 hp


6472
Test so

Hello

Sorry pabloescobar if you might know what kind of changes have you made?

[pabloescobar]

The fact with time, and I'm sure that must be why? gi? I have tried it on other machines like this. But with what instrument you write?

ecm me sees it as a 75hp

put it normal to make the service reset and then shoot him that I sent and see if it goes for me I have already done before, and although they say that the soft is not doing a good job, the car that I did walk without problem

6473
This ? the driver in the ecm is giving me

[ugoboss]

The fact with time, and I'm sure that must be why? gi? I have tried it on other machines like this. But with what instrument you write?

hello paploescobar, if you've done with time, as for the other infinityecu, because the files are different?

[infinityecu]

put it normal to make the service reset and then shoot him that I sent and see if it goes for me I have already done before, and although they say that the soft is not doing a good job, the car that I did walk without problem

Pabloescobar thanks but I have used time loader also, however, the driver in the ecm if he takes it with the 75 hp, but the map ? a 90 hp I know anyway in this case I do a test and let you know

[pabloescobar]

This is not as you say ugo, in fact, when I tried the file with a time and compared with that of infinity I saw that they were different so you couldn't tell

[ugoboss]

ok, thanks.

[infinityecu]

6473
This ? the driver in the ecm is giving me

My ecm titanium I don't recognize ilk driver file to the ori and the open with a driver 75 hp manual version of the ecm are you??? It is the original?

[pabloescobar]

ecm titanium gold

version 1.72

[infinityecu]

version 1.72

Understand, however, I am able to open it with the titanium 1.61 and not ? ori but still I hope for the best

[pabloescobar]

Write about what I sent you and don't worry. Ah I don't do the check sum why? the kess master makes me write

[infinityecu]

Write about what I sent you and don't worry. Ah I don't do the check sum why? the kess master makes me write

Understand, also, the rooster v2 v 51 he does write, but anyway thank you you do? know

[cinqueturbo]

6473
This ? the driver in the ecm is giving me


Pabloescobar thanks but I have used time loader also, however, the driver in the ecm if he takes it with the 75 hp, but the map ? a 90 hp I know anyway in this case I do a test and let you know

infinityecu but HW and SW are with the driver posted by pabloescobar?

[infinityecu]

infinityecu but HW and SW are with the driver posted by pabloescobar?

no cinqueturbo with the version of the ecm 1.61 I find them with another drover, but by opening it manually while pabloescobar find it automatically, even if a 75 hp, but why? has the version 1.71 updated the original

[Antonio46]

I wanted to intervene, saying that the Time on the Renault Scenic patch-in fact the dpf deletes for? does not disable the probes probably the switch off? however it does not ? reliable even on that

[legendaryslave]

according to wrong already from a file that is not gold

[infinityecu]

according to wrong already from a file that is not gold

But the file ? ori why? not ? ori?

[pabloescobar]

The file ? ori why? if it had not been so the ecm would not open

[Antonio46]

In fact the ecm if it recognizes it ? ori

[legendaryslave]

The file ? ori why? if it had not been so the ecm would not open
then I was wrong because the tita 1.6't find the driver

[infinityecu]

then I was wrong because the tita 1.6't find the driver

The tita 1.6 nn is the driver just because? not ? up-to-date while l 1.7 found with a driver 75 hp but I with the 1.6, I always open the same by putting the driver manually, a 75 hp

[legendaryslave]

Ok said there? I saw the file and there we are right on this ecu not just the Switch

[Tuningmotor88]

The tita 1.6 nn is the driver just because? not ? up-to-date while l 1.7 found with a driver 75 hp but I with the 1.6, I always open the same by putting the driver manually, a 75 hp
Hello infinity reading the discussion, I can only say that to remove the fap on this car the software are not effective but bisogns intervene manualnente by the swicht off errors

[leandro89]

Hello infinity reading the discussion, I can only say that to remove the fap on this car the software are not effective but bisogns intervene manualnente by the swicht off errors

I would like to point out that the user that you have mentioned ? been banned

[msport (exil77grande)]

I would like to point out that the user that you have mentioned ? been banned

leandro, in fact, he answered himself.