Sign in

View The Full Version : exclusion egr on the opel corsa 1.3 69cv



Makx
Hello everyone, should I delete the indicator, mil remains on, the opel corsa 1.3 69cv engine Z13DT after closing with flange the passage egr.

I have read and saved the file from the ecu but I have the distinct impression that the instrument or the program not have read it correctly.
I'm attaching the file and ask you if it can really be the mapping that you're running the car.
I have this doubt because watching it in 2D (16-bit motorola), the very long first part with a flat line to a decimal value of 6535 from the beginning until the address 060006, I don't see it in any of the files ori or mod of opel with which I have compared it to the map.

if according to you the map is correct, I ask you to give me the straight on the value or values to edit to exclude the egr, and/or have the lamp MIL lights on the framework.

CLAUDIO.
you have made a diagnosis ,that gives you the error ? the electrical part of the egr valve works or is defective ?

Makx
the diagnosis gives me a error related to exhaust gas recirculation.
the flange on this car I put it almost a year ago and it seems to me that from the tests made the working of the electric part.
it was locked to x dirty.
what do you think of the map? is trusted?
(I put there only 5 minutes to do the reading)

Makx
the diagnosis gives me a error related to exhaust gas recirculation.
the flange on this car I put it almost a year ago and it seems to me that from the tests made the working of the electric part.
it was locked to x dirty.
what do you think of the map? is trusted?
(I put there only 5 minutes to do the reading)

riox80
I can not open this file....what tool did you read it?

lui93
nada even I can't open the file

cinqueturbo
Hello, next time, take a moment to write which programmer you used

The file has the right Size for reading in the serial Partial 448KB and is 100% OK

EGR to address 061EEE to take 47506,0000

Makx
I read it with Kess, I try to ripostarlo.
instead of zipparlo the ones with the extension .rar so that it is a valid extension to upload, but the file is not compressed.
delete the extension .rar after downloading it
the file as I have it saved on my pc has no extension.
with ecm I open it without problems also without the extension).

cinqueturbo
I read it with Kess, I try to ripostarlo.
instead of zipparlo the ones with the extension .rar so that it is a valid extension to upload, but the file is not compressed.
delete the extension .rar after downloading it
the file as I have it saved on my pc has no extension.
with ecm I open it without problems also without the extension).

I do not see where is the problem???

except for the fact that you have not uploaded the file in the database, the File Ori and appointed that only you can find in a few weeks??

What would a Copy of cico_opel_z13dt????

Kess Serial OPEL CORSA 1,3 CDTI 16V 70CV MJD6 1413X586 01245JO01D Exchange? ORI? MOD? driver C13_79D6 here's how naming a file

Makx
Thanks 1000 Cinqueturbo, I had not read your post and I was responding to him, and riox, who said that not being able to open the file.

I changed as you told me you " EGR to address 061EEE to take 47506,0000 " .
I did it using the display motorola 16-bit, the one that I said at the first split I've done well to use that?

now place the file .the mod with the only change of the value for egr off compared to what I have read from the ecu.

I apologize for the inexperience and I will try to name the files in the correct way.
z13dt is the engine code, the driver I used (I have not been able to choose between the 4 that the ecm proposed to me).

I ask, in addition to confirming that the file has been read correctly.

I add a file I found from a cd-rom database. is what put me in confusion seeing similar Info to the one I read, but completely different in the first part of the map. The one I read has a very long first part with a flat line to a decimal value of 6535 from the beginning until the address 060006

cinqueturbo
Thanks 1000 Cinqueturbo, I had not read your post and I was responding to him, and riox, who said that not being able to open the file.

I changed as you told me you " EGR to address 061EEE to take 47506,0000 " .
I did it using the display motorola 16-bit, the one that I said at the first split I've done well to use that?

now place the file .the mod with the only change of the value for egr off compared to what I have read from the ecu.

I apologize for the inexperience and I will try to name the files in the correct way.
z13dt is the engine code, the driver I used (I have not been able to choose between the 4 that the ecm proposed to me).

I ask, in addition to confirming that the file has been read correctly.

I add a file I found from a cd-rom database. is what put me in confusion seeing similar Info to the one I read, but completely different in the first part of the map. The one I read has a very long first part with a flat line to a decimal value of 6535 from the beginning until the address 060006

EGR Excluding Well..

that's why you need to appoint a file..
you have noticed that you have another code?

Your: 1413X586 01245JO01D

Makx
ehmm... Cinqueturbo.... I do not agree...

the number 5 that you highlight in red I do not see him anywhere.
in the file that I have read the Number of the control unit I is identical in the first part, but more along 01246JO01DDM04001 01246JO01D. the part that stretches, excluding the letters DM the meeting in the COD in the HOMO of both files 04001 or 0400164.
Can you give me a summary of what's on indicate all of these codes?

instead, changes completely the software number 1414X188 or 1413X185.

the thing that most makes me odd are, however, the checksum, because they are different if you work with the same hardware? ok I admit I did not understand for nothing in the sense of the checksum to me can you explain (or direct me to a specific link in the forum that I can not find where this is explained clearly).

because the chechsum changes after the change compared with the checksum of the file as I read it?

I also still doubt ke my Kess has read the file correctly .ori, those too many differences in the database file that I found leave me puzzled. the reason why I'm doubt is that the Kess I do work in a virtualbox, which simulates windows XP in a basis of S. Or Ubuntu... I had to install them because if the istallo in the partition with win xp "true" on my laptop, something is conflicting with the program or with the driver of the tool that I use for diagnosis (and not work anymore' nothing since that is not the format, and reistallo all)

below are the info of the file so that they are easily readable

read file from my Kess "ori"

Marelli
Num HW: 01246JO01DDM04001
Opel 1.3 Multijet
Num SW: 1414X188
Part. Num:: 55196352
Cod OMO: 04001
------------------------------
Size: 458752 = 0x70000
Cks = 0x6348774

file from database

Marelli
Num HW: 01246JO01D
Opel 1.3 Multijet
Num SW: 1413X185
Part. Num:: 55196352
Cod OMO: 0400164
------------------------------
Size: 458752 = 0x70000
Cks = 0x21B912D


modified file x closing the egr

Marelli
Num HW: 01246JO01DDM04001
Opel 1.3 Multijet
Num SW: 1414X188
Part. Num:: 55196352
Cod OMO: 04001
------------------------------
Size: 458752 = 0x70000

Makx
could someone please compare the file I read (attached in the zip on page 1) and compare it with a .ori of the same characteristics and tell me if it is correct the reading that I have done?

Makx
Then, I think I understand what is the checksum...
in my own words I would say: the result of an algorithm applied to the bits of the file loaded in the eeprom, only if a specific value is accepted by the control unit to work.



The diversity between the two maps is due to the more complete reading made at the tour (probably in bdm) with respect to the serial one that I made.
therefore, I do not have to worry about diversity since the rewrite, if made with the same instrument, will not vary the final result of the "complete map" (includes values from me are not detected in the eeprom or other components internal to the ecu, such as the micro or eprom).

am I right here?

I, however, remain two doubts, one is, and if serial we work exclusively on the eeprom... it is not possible to meter the hands of the data on the eprom (and not even on the bench I suppose if we do not have the uva lamp for erasing), to tour the micro is a component of "workable"?

The other doubt concerns the checksum.
although he is aware that Kess correct him at the time of writing I have tried the function correct checksum of Titanium and, despite having had an Ok response, correct checksum, I see from the info that this has a value other than ' to the file .ori.
looking at the map I see that the correction checksum is made from Titanium (having loaded the correct driver) has created the difference in a bit map file .mod but the checksum value in the info is different, however, with respect to the file .ori, as I said.

why?

correct the checksum even if Kess the ricorreggerĂ  at the time of the upload the file in the ecu is a mistake? create problems?

cinqueturbo
Are you going to make a mess and I do not know what to write and think..



the checksum is not and nothing else that the integrity of the file.. change if you make a change in conclusion change if the file is different.. look on Wikipedia...

the uva lamp were no longer used for decades now.. it was for the old ecu..

what did you read from the ecu and Flash the eprom

holy virgin help us help you..

Makx
Ok, I will upload the file .mod that you tell me that it's Ok and dead li...

in short, all the things that I wrote were not to doubt but to understand more in this world ecu to me again.

Thank you for the answers and tomorrow or Wednesday carichero the file in the ecu.
then and'll post the result or if the indicator light mil and errors in diagnosis will be gone

cinqueturbo
Ok, I will upload the file .mod that you tell me that it's Ok and dead li...

in short, all the things that I wrote were not to doubt but to understand more in this world ecu to me again.

Thank you for the answers and tomorrow or Wednesday carichero the file in the ecu.
then and'll post the result or if the indicator light mil and errors in diagnosis will be gone


My boy to learn we need to read not write, and experience in the field..

Makx
I have uploaded the file .mod deleted the only error that was present in the system (exhaust gas recirculation).
the light is turned off only temporarily. the next day the owner of the car told me to have turned on the indicator light mil at first power on of the drive.
nn I still have the magazine but I guess this is the same error seen that no ce nerano others.

Errecinque
I have uploaded the file .mod deleted the only error that was present in the system (exhaust gas recirculation).
the light is turned off only temporarily. the next day the owner of the car told me to have turned on the indicator light mil at first power on of the drive.
nn I still have the magazine but I guess this is the same error seen that no ce nerano others.
If the 5T has said that the egr is excluded well, surely it came out another problem....maybe it has the electric route just the valve. Make the diagnosis prior to and post the errors, maybe you need to take quanche dtc on the map

riox80
If you want to have a certainty for the electricity...off the jack and plug in a lamp 21w....(those with a filament that you use as for the reverse) and in this way you take off a doubt...test already done...

Makx
fortunately or unfortunately, we will never know..
the car was sold this morning.
I had asked the owner to spend x to get rid of curiosity to see the dtc, but has not had tembo.

good for him, who has already sold, even with lamp on.

thanks for the help to all, in particular, the 5T ;)